Survey of Electors – Whitby–Oshawa / Yellowhead By-elections
Appendix B: Socio-Demographic Characteristics
This section outlines the demographic composition of the sample interviewed in this study. Overall, the sample had a good age and gender mix in both ridings. Whitby–Oshawa had a slightly higher proportion of female respondents (52% vs. 48%) and Yellowhead had a slightly higher proportion of male respondents (51% vs. 49%). The sample composition in terms of age was pretty similar in Whitby–Oshawa and Yellowhead.
Gender | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Male | 50% | 48% | 51% |
Female | 50% | 52% | 49% |
Age | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
18-34 | 27% | 27% | 28% |
35-54 | 41% | 42% | 40% |
55 and older | 31% | 30% | 33% |
Overall, close to nine in ten (88%) respondents were White/Caucasian. In Yellowhead, the proportion of White/Caucasian Canadians was significantly high than in Whitby–Oshawa (91% vs. 85%). Whitby–Oshawa had higher proportion of respondents who were Black Canadians (4% vs. 0%).
Ethnicity | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
White/Caucasian (Non-visible minority) | 89% | 86% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions92% |
Black | 2% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions4% | 0% |
Aboriginal Canadian | 2% | 1% | 3% |
South Asian/East Indian | 1% | 2% | 0% |
West Asian/North African/Arabs | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Latin American | 0% | 1% | 0% |
Filipino | 0% | 1% | 0% |
East Asia | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Chinese | 0% | 1% | 0% |
Pacific Islands | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Other | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Don't know | 2% | 1% | 2% |
Refusal | 2% | 3% | 1% |
Majority (90%) of those who took part in this study were born in Canada. Some other countries mentioned include United Kingdom (2%) and United States, Germany, Caribbean and Netherlands (all mentioned by 1% of respondents). The proportion of those born in Canada was significantly higher in Yellowhead (94%) as compared to Whitby–Oshawa (85%).
Country of birth | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | 90% | 85% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions94% |
United Kingdom | 2% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions4% | 1% |
United States | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Germany | 1% | 0% | 1% |
Caribbean (general) | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Netherlands/Holland | 1% | 1% | 0% |
India | 0% | 1% | 0% |
South Africa | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Italy | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Philippines | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Poland | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Hong Kong | 0% | 0% | 0% |
China | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Other | 3% | 4% | 1% |
Don't know/Refused | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Overall, nearly half of the respondents worked full time (47%) and two in five (19%) were retired. The proportion of those working part-time was significantly higher in Yellowhead (11% vs. 7%, respectively). Yellowhead also had a significantly higher proportion of respondents who were self-employed (14% vs. 6%, respectively).
Employment Status | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Working full-time (35 hours/week or more) | 47% | 49% | 45% |
Working part-time (less than 35 hours/week) | 9% | 7% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions11% |
Unemployed or looking for a job | 4% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions5% | 3% |
Self-employed | 10% | 6% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions14% |
Stay at home full-time | 5% | 4% | 6% |
Student | 5% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions8% | 3% |
Retired | 19% | 20% | 17% |
Disability pension | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Don't know/Refused | 1% | 1% | 1% |
There were a significantly higher proportion of University graduates in Whitby–Oshawa (38% vs. 18%) whereas Yellowhead had a higher proportion of those who have completed High school or less.
Education | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
HS Grad or Less | 29% | 18% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions39% |
Community College | 34% | 34% | 35% |
Some University | 7% | 7% | 6% |
University Grad | 28% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions38% | 18% |
Other | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Don't know/refusal | 1% | 1% | 2% |
Respondents from both ridings were fairly similar in terms of their annual household income. Yellowhead had a slightly higher proportion of respondents in the lowest two income groups.
Household income | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Under $20,000 | 3% | 2% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions4% |
$20,000 to just under $40,000 | 8% | 6% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions9% |
$40,000 to just under $60,000 | 9% | 8% | 10% |
$60,000 to just under $80,000 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
$80,000 to just under $100,000 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
$100,000 and over | 40% | 42% | 38% |
Don't know/Refused | 18% | 20% | 17% |
In most cases, Internet usage has been found to be affected by age and education of respondents. In this study, the sample composition is fairly similar in terms of age of respondents but Whitby–Oshawa had significantly higher proportion of University graduates. This could be one of the reasons for a significantly higher proportion of Whitby–Oshawa respondents indicating that they use Internet.
Internet Usage | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 90% | This number indicates a significant difference between demographic sub-groups and regions93% | 87% |
No | 9% | 6% | 12% |
Don't know/Refusal | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Less than one in ten (7%) respondents who participated in this study had a disability. Although this proportion was slightly higher in Whitby–Oshawa, the difference was minimal (8% vs. 6%). More than two in five (42%) disabled respondents had issues with mobility. Other disabilities commonly mentioned include co-ordination of dexterity (11%), mental health (7%), back injury/trouble (6%) and joints/knees/hips (6%).
Table B.8: Respondents with disability
Disability | Total (n=1,503) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=753) |
Yellowhead (n=750) |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 7% | 8% | 6% |
No | 93% | 92% | 94% |
Nature of disability | Total (n=116) |
Whitby–Oshawa (n=66) |
Yellowhead (n=50) |
---|---|---|---|
Mobility | 42% | 40% | 45% |
Co-ordination or dexterity | 11% | 11% | 12% |
Mental health (general) | 7% | 9% | 5% |
Back injury/trouble | 6% | 5% | 8% |
Joints/knees/hips | 6% | 3% | 9% |
Deaf or hard of hearing | 5% | 8% | 2% |
Spinal cord/paralysis | 5% | 5% | 5% |
Arthritis | 5% | 3% | 7% |
Blind or visual impairment | 4% | 7% | 0% |
Diabetes | 2% | 1% | 4% |
Speech impairment | 2% | 2% | 2% |
Other | 25% | 22% | 29% |
Don't know | 3% | 3% | 4% |
Refusal | 4% | 6% | 2% |